Warning: Undefined array key "post_type_share_twitter_account" in /var/www/vhosts/casinonewsblogger.com/public_html/wp-content/themes/cryptocurrency/vslmd/share/share.php on line 24


Triton Poker

Multiway pots have long been one of the toughest areas to study in poker. Deep stacks, multiple ranges, and complicated board interactions make these spots difficult to solve, and until recently, running accurate simulations could take hours.

WPT Global streamer Lukas “RobinPoker” Robinson revisited a fascinating hand from the Triton WSOP Paradise $250K Invitational and used the new multiway AI feature in GTO Wizard to break down the action.

With three players seeing the flop at over 200 big blinds deep, the hand offered a perfect example of how modern tools can now solve situations that once felt impossible to analyse.

Event Context

The hand took place early in the $250K buy-in tournament, with 98 players remaining and blinds at 500/1,000 with a 1,000 ante.

All players involved were extremely deep-stacked, with each holding well over 200 big blinds. Multiway pots at these stack depths create complex decision trees, especially when ranges widen and positional advantages become more important.

Because the new multiway solver currently supports stack depths up to 250 big blinds, each player’s stack was adjusted to that level to simulate the hand accurately.

The Hand

Cong Pham opened to 3,000 from the cutoff holding Q9. Armin Ghojehvand called on the button with 86 before David D’Alessandro three-bet to 10,000 from the small blind with AJ.

Both Pham and Ghojehvand called, creating a three-way pot.

The flop came Q85. D’Alessandro checked, Pham bet 16,000, and both opponents called.

The turn brought the 8. D’Alessandro checked again, Pham bet 25,000, and both opponents called once more.

The river fell 4. After two checks, Ghojehvand bet 55,000 with trip eights. D’Alessandro folded, while Pham called and mucked after seeing the winning hand.

Pre-Flop Analysis

Cutoff opening range
Cutoff opening range

Pham’s open with Q9 is solver-approved, although at a very low frequency. Most of the time, Q9 offsuit folds from the cutoff, but mixing in occasional raises helps keep ranges balanced.

Button preflop range vs cutoff open
Button preflop range vs cutoff open

Ghojehvand’s call with 86 on the button is also approved. Suited connectors perform well in position, and the solver frequently mixes between calling and three-betting with this type of hand.

SB preflop range vs. open and call
SB preflop range vs. open and call

D’Alessandro’s three-bet with AJ is fully solver-approved, but the sizing is slightly too small. When playing deep stacks out of position against multiple opponents, the solver prefers larger three-bet sizes to make it harder for callers to realise equity.

CO range vs. three-bet
CO range vs. three-bet
Q9o EV vs three-bet
Q9o EV vs three-bet

Pham’s call of the three-bet is the first major mistake in the hand. Even against the smaller three-bet size, Q9 offsuit should be a pure fold. Calling loses around 1.58 big blinds in expected value.

BTN range vs three-bet & call
BTN range vs three-bet & call

Ghojehvand’s call was GTO-approved due to the wider calling range from the CO versus the 10bb three-bet from the small blind. The button is now able to call much wider, as they are getting a very good price in position against both players.

To continue analysing the hand realistically, Pham’s range was nodelocked to include wider calls than the solver would normally allow.

Flop Analysis

SB flop strategy
SB flop strategy

The Q85 flop gave top pair for Pham and middle pair plus backdoor potential for Ghojehvand.

D’Alessandro’s check with AJ is solver-approved. Out of position in a multiway pot, the solver prefers checking most of the time, especially without a made hand.

CO flop strategy
CO flop strategy

Pham’s bet of 16,000 with Q9 is solver-approved at low frequency. In multiway pots, betting frequencies drop dramatically, and the solver recommends betting only around 11.7% of hands here.

BTN flop strategy vs. CO bet
BTN flop strategy vs. CO bet

Ghojehvand’s call with 86 is standard. With middle pair and backdoor potential, calling is clearly profitable.

SB flop stategy vs bet & call
AJs EV
AJs EV

D’Alessandro’s call is the second major mistake. The solver strongly prefers folding in this spot, as continuing with ace-high against two opponents loses significant expected value (EV).

Turn Analysis

SB turn strategy
SB turn strategy

The 8 on the turn significantly changes the hand. Ghojehvand improved to trips, while Pham still held top pair. D’Alessandro also picked up the flush draw.

D’Alessandro checked again, which remains solver-approved.

CO turn strategy
CO turn strategy

Pham’s second barrel of 25,000 is solver-disapproved. While some betting is allowed, the solver strongly prefers checking with this specific hand, as betting risks value-owning against stronger ranges in a multiway pot.

BTN turn strategy
BTN turn strategy
86s EV

Ghojehvand’s call is correct, though solver output shows raising produces even higher EV. Raising to a much larger size would maximize value and pressure weaker holdings.

SB turn strategy vs bet & call
SB turn strategy vs bet & call
AJs EV
AJs EV

D’Alessandro’s call is another clear mistake. Even with a flush draw, the solver prefers folding, as continuing loses over five big blinds in EV.

River Analysis

SB river strategy
SB river strategy

The 4 completed no meaningful draws, leaving Ghojehvand with trip eights and Pham holding a weak top pair.

CO river strategy
CO river strategy
BTN river strategy
BTN river strategy
86s EV
86s EV

After both opponents checked, Ghojehvand fired 55,000 into the pot. This river bet is solver-approved and closely matches optimal sizing strategy. While the solver frequently uses all-in sizing in similar spots, this bet still captures strong value against worse hands.

SB river strategy vs. bet
SB river strategy vs. bet

D’Alessandro’s fold is straightforward and solver-approved.

CO river strategy vs. bet
CO river strategy vs. bet
Q9 EV vs bet
Q9 EV vs bet

Pham’s call is solver-approved at mixed frequency. Interestingly, calling generates slightly higher EV than folding, winning around 0.59 big blinds more in expected value.

Why This Hand Matters

Multiway pots like this have historically been difficult to analyse, especially at deep stack depths. The introduction of AI-driven multiway solvers now allows players to evaluate these complex situations quickly and accurately.

One of the most powerful features highlighted in this hand is nodelocking, which allows players to adjust ranges based on real-world mistakes rather than assuming perfect GTO play. This makes solver study more practical and far more relevant to actual gameplay.

This hand shows just how complicated multiway pots can become, and how small mistakes compound across streets.

Pham’s pre-flop call created a difficult post-flop situation, while D’Alessandro’s continued calls lost significant value throughout the hand. Meanwhile, Ghojehvand’s line stayed close to optimal, ultimately resulting in a well-earned pot.

With tools like GTO Wizard’s new multiway AI solver, these once-impossible spots are now easier than ever to analyse and offers players a clearer path to improving their decision-making in complex multiway scenarios.

Lukas Robinson

WPT Global Streamer

Lukas “RobinPoker” Robinson is a professional poker player, streamer and content creator. In 2021, he gained significant recognition by setting a Twitch world record, streaming 1,000 hours of online poker over 100 days. Robinson also participated in the inaugural season of “Game of Gold.”





Source link